Article 2: Effective Steps of Human Resources Planning

What is the reality and theoretical perspective of Human Resources Planning (HRP)?

Human Resources Planning (HRP) is a strategic organizational process that involves forecasting, identifying, and addressing an organization's current and future human resource needs. In reality, HRP integrates theoretical frameworks that guide its practical implementation, contributing to organizational effectiveness.

Definition and Purpose:

• Reality: HRP involves assessing the present and future human resource requirements for an organization to achieve its objectives (Gupta, 2007).
  
• Theoretical Reference: The Human Capital Theory asserts that investments in human capital, including HRP, contribute to organizational success (Becker, 1964).

Strategic Symphony: Navigating the Steps of Human Resources Planning

Human Resources Planning (HRP) is a strategic process that ensures an organization has the correct quantity and quality of personnel to achieve its objectives. Effectively navigating HRP involves several key steps, each grounded in theoretical perspectives that enhance organizational success.

Environmental Scanning:

• Step: Conduct a thorough analysis of the external environment, including economic, technological, and demographic factors.
• Theoretical Reference: PESTLE analysis aligns with this step, emphasizing the importance of considering Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors (Perera, 2017).

Internal Analysis:

• Step: Evaluate the current internal workforce, skills, and competencies.
• Theoretical Reference: The Resource-Based View (RBV) theory posits that internal resources, including human capital, contribute to a firm's competitive advantage (Barney, 1991). In-depth examination of organizational staff, skills, and composition (Grieves, 2003).

Forecasting Future Demand:

• Step: Predict future staffing needs based on business goals and external factors.
• Theoretical Reference: Workforce demand forecasting draws on economic indicators and organizational growth models (Boudreau & Ramstad, 2005).

Supply Analysis:

• Step: Assess the availability of internal and external talent to meet future demand.
• Theoretical Reference: The Labor Market Theory is applicable here, emphasizing the relationship between labor supply and demand (Doeringer & Piore, 1971).

Gap Analysis:

• Step: Identify the gaps between future demand and current workforce capabilities.
• Theoretical Reference: Gap analysis aligns with the Contingency Theory, emphasizing aligning HR practices with organizational strategies (Youndt et al., 1996).

Action Planning:

• Step: Develop strategies to address the identified gaps, including recruitment, training, and talent development.
• Theoretical Reference: The Resource Dependence Theory underscores the strategic role of HR planning in securing critical resources for organizational effectiveness (Pfeffer & Salancik, 1978).

Implementation:

• Step: Put the action plans into motion, ensuring alignment with organizational objectives.
• Theoretical Reference: Institutional Theory suggests that organizations conform to established practices, thus implementing plans that align with industry norms (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983).

Monitoring and Evaluation:

• Step: Continuously monitor HR activities and evaluate their effectiveness.
• Theoretical Reference: The Control Theory argues that organizations need mechanisms to ensure activities align with planned objectives (Cyert & March, 1963).

Feedback and Adaptation:

• Step: Gather feedback from the implementation phase and adapt plans accordingly.
• Theoretical Reference: Feedback loops align with the concept of Organizational Learning, emphasizing the adaptive nature of effective organizations (Argyris & Schön, 1978).

Legal and Ethical Compliance:

• Step: Ensure all HR planning activities comply with legal and ethical standards.
• Theoretical Reference: Legal compliance is based on principles of Business Ethics, which advocate for fair and ethical treatment of employees (Ferrell et al., 2013).

By integrating these steps, organizations can establish a robust Human Resources Planning process, ensuring they have the right talent in the right place at the right time, aligned with the organization's strategic objectives.

 

Key Metrics for Human Resources Planning Excellence

Employee Retention Strategy:

Employee retention strategy, as proposed by Boxall and Purcell (2011), emphasizes creating a talent-centric culture within an organization. This approach focuses on nurturing an environment that values and prioritizes skilled individuals, aiming to retain their expertise and contributions over the long term. The strategy involves implementing practices and policies that recognize and fulfill the needs of high-caliber employees, fostering their commitment and loyalty to the organization.

1. Fostering a talent-centric culture to retain skilled individuals (Boxall & Purcell, 2011).
2. Workforce Analysis: In-depth examination of organizational staff, skills, and composition (Grieves, 2003).
3. Continuous Learning Initiatives: Establishing pathways for ongoing employee development and growth (Noe et al., 2021).
4. Strategic Recruitment of Talent: Attracting and onboarding highly qualified individuals (Gatewood et al., 2011).

 

Conclusion

Human Resources Planning (HRP) is like a well-orchestrated symphony, choreographed to align an organization's human capital with its future goals. This intricate dance between practical reality and theoretical insights resembles distinct musical notes, each playing a vital role in the organizational melody.

Starting with the rhythmic sway of PESTLE analysis, HRP's dance acknowledges external influences that set the tempo for the environmental scan. Here, Wilson and Correia's (1997) framework, encompassing political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental factors, initiates the opening movements.

Transitioning to the internal realm, the lead is taken by the Resource-Based View (RBV) theory embodied by Barney (1991). Similar to a musical score, this theory dissects the organization's internal composition, revealing the notes of skills and competencies contributing to the competitive advantage melody. This internal analysis acts as an introspective pause before the dynamic crescendo of forecasting future demand.

Guided by the Labor Market Theory of Doeringer and Piore (1971), the conductor assesses the talent supply, delicately balancing internal and external forces to achieve a harmonious melody between demand and supply. Gap analysis enters the scene, accompanied by the Contingency Theory, leading the organization in a dance of cohesion, as directed by Youndt et al. (1996).

In the ballroom of action planning, the spotlight is on the Resource Dependence Theory. Pfeffer and Salancik (1978) encourage organizations to plan HR activities strategically, ensuring they secure the critical resources for effective performance. This strategic planning sets the tone for an energetic implementation, with Institutional Theory whispering that adherence to established practices ensures seamless integration with industry norms (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983).

---

References:

• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. MA: Addison-Westley.
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Newbury Park: Journal of Management, SAGE, 17(1), 99-120. 
• Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
• Boudreau, J.W. and Ramstad, P.M. (2005). Talentship and the evolution of human resource management: From professional practices to strategic talent decision science. Human Resource Planning Journal, 28(2), pp.17-26.
• Boxall, P.F., Purcell, J. (2011). Strategy and Human Resource Management. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.
• Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2(4), pp.169-187.
• Dachner, A.M., Ellingson, J.E., Noe, R.A. and Saxton, B.M. (2021). The future of employee development. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2), p.100732.
• DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, pp.147-160.
• Doeringer PB, Piore MJ. (1971). Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Lexington, MA, Heath.
• Ferrell, O.C., Rogers, M.M., Ferrell, L. and Sawayda, J. (2013). A framework for understanding ethical supply chain decision making. Journal of Marketing Channels, 20(3-4), pp.260-287.
• Gatewood, J.B. (2011). Personal knowledge and collective representations. A companion to cognitive anthropology, pp.102-114.
• Grieves, J. (2003). Strategic human resource development. SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Gupta, A.K. and Wang, H. (2007). Getting your China and India strategy right. Wall Street Journal, 28, pp.502-526.
• Perera, R. (2017) The PESTLE analysis. Nerdynaut.
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
• Youndt, M.A., Snell, S.A., Dean Jr, J.W. and Lepak, D.P. (1996). Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of management Journal, 39(4), pp.836-866.